Male-female interactions are a much broader topic than ‘mere’ mate choice aspects would suggest. Males and females may be selected to look or to behave differently in many ways, and this has a lot of consequences. Here we also try to answer the question why males (in the sense of being sperm or pollen producers) exist in the first place.
| Kokko, H. 2024. Who is afraid of modelling time as a continuous variable? Methods in Ecology and Evolution. (Contains an example on how matelessness and selection to seek mates or shorten the ‘time out’ can be modelled without unnecessarily discretizing time… which why it’s mentioned in this section) | |
| Kokko, H. In press. Sex-specific life histories. In Life history evolution: traits, interactions, and applications (eds. M. Segoli & E. Wajnberg), Wiley. | |
| Ekrem, R.K. & Kokko, H. 2023. Sexual conflict over phenological traits: Selection for protandry can lock populations into temporally mismatched reproduction. Evolution 77:789-800. | |
| Kokko, H. & Jennions, M.D. 2023. Is more always better when it comes to mating? PLoS Biology 21:e3001955. | |
| Luepold, S.B., Kokko, H., Grendelmeier, A. & Pasinelli, G. 2023. Habitat detection, habitat assessment, or mating benefits: what drives conspecific attraction in a nomadic songbird? J. Anim. Ecol. 92: 195-206. | |
| Kovalov, V. & Kokko, H. 2022. Selection for male stamina can help explain costly displays with cost-minimizing female choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 76: 69. | |
| Klein, K., Kokko, H. & ten Brink, H. 2021. Disentangling verbal arguments: intralocus sexual conflict in haplodiploids. American Naturalist 198: 678–693. | |
| Li, X.-Y. & Kokko, H. 2021. Sexual dimorphism driven by intersexual resource competition: why is it rare, and where to look for it? Journal of Animal Ecology 90: 1831-1843. | |
| Constable, G.W.A. & Kokko, H. 2021. Parthenogenesis and the evolution of anisogamy. Cells 10: 2467. | |
| Brunton-Martin, A.L., Gaskett, A.C. & Kokko, H. 2021. Resilience of haplodiploids to being exploited by sexually deceptive plants. Oikos 130: 2053–2063. | |
| Kokko, H. 2021. The tired copepod and the definition of sexual selection: a comment on Shuker and Kvarnemo. Behavioral Ecology 32:795–802. | |
| Ismail, S. & Kokko, H. 2020. An analysis of mating biases in trees. Molecular Ecology 29: 184-198. | |
| Aubier, T., Kokko, H. & Joron, M. 2019. Coevolution of male and female mate choice can destabilise reproductive isolation. Nature Communications 10: 5122. | |
| Safari, I., Goymann, W. & Kokko, H. 2019. Male-only care and cuckoldry in black coucals: does parenting hamper sex life? Proc. R. Soc. B 286: 20182789. | |
| Li, X.-Y. & Kokko, H. 2019. Intersexual resource competition and the evolution of sex-biased dispersal. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7: 111. | |
| Li, X.-Y. & Kokko, H. 2019. Sex-biased dispersal: a review of the theory. Biol. Rev. 94: 721-736. | |
| Kokko, H. 2018. When sex differences lead to extinction. Nature 556: 315-316 [News & Views of Martins et al. 2018]. | |
| Shaw, A., Kokko, H. & Neubert, M. 2018. Sex differences and Allee effects shape the dynamics of sex-structured invasions. Journal of Animal Ecology 87: 36-46. | |
| Kokko, H. 2017. Give one species the task to come up with a theory that spans them all: what good can come out of that? Proc. R. Soc. B 284: 20171652. | |
| Fromhage, L., Jennions, M. & Kokko, H. 2015. The evolution of sex roles in mate searching. Evolution 70-3: 617–624. | |
| Henshaw, J.M., Kokko, H. & Jennions, M.D. 2015. Direct reciprocity stabilises simultaneous hermaphroditism at high mating rates: a model of sex allocation with egg trading. Evolution 69: 2129–2139. | |
| haiku pdf | Kokko, H. & Hochberg, M.E. 2015. Towards cancer-aware life-history modelling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 370: 20140234. |
| haiku pdf | Shaw, A.K. & Kokko, H. 2015. Dispersal evolution in the presence of Allee effects can speed up or slow down invasions. American Naturalist 185: 631–639. |
| haiku pdf | Boddy, A.M., Kokko, H., Breden. F., Wilkinson, G. & Aktipis, C.A. 2015. Cancer susceptibility and reproductive trade-offs: a model of the evolution of cancer defences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 370: 20140220. |
| haiku pdf | Holman, L., Price, T., Wedell, N. & Kokko, H. 2015. Coevolutionary dynamics of polyandry and sex-linked meiotic drive. Evolution 69: 709–720. |
| haiku pdf | Umbers, K.D.L., Symonds, M.R.E. & Kokko, H. 2015. The mothematics of female pheromone signalling: strategies for aging virgins. American Naturalist 185: 417–432. |
| Henshaw, J.M., Jennions, M.D. & Kokko, H. 2014. The economics of egg-trading: mating rate, sperm competition, and positive frequency-dependence. Dynamic Games and Applications 4: 379–390. | |
| haiku | Shaw, A.K. & Kokko, H. 2014. Mate finding, Allee effects, and selection for sex-biased dispersal. Journal of Animal Ecology 83: 1256–1267. |
| Harts, A., Schwanz, L. & Kokko, H. 2014. Demography can favour female-advantageous alleles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 281: 20140005. | |
| Fromhage, L. & Kokko, H. 2014. Sexually selected traits evolve positive allometry when some matings occur irrespective of the trait. Evolution 68: 1332–1338. | |
| Kokko, H. & Jennions, M.D. 2014. The relationship between sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: The Genetics and Biology of Sexual Conflict (S. Gavrilets and W.R. Rice, eds.) Cold Spring Harbor Press 18: a017517. | |
| Henshaw, J.M., Marshall, D.J., Jennions, M.D. & Kokko, H. 2014. Local gamete competition explains sex allocation and fertilization strategies in the sea. American Naturalist 184: E32–E49. | |
| Holman, L. & Kokko, H. 2014. The evolution of genomic imprinting: costs, benefits and long-term consequences. Biological Reviews 89: 568–587. | |
| haiku | Harts, A. & Kokko, H. 2013. Understanding promiscuity: when is seeking additional mates better than guarding an already found one? Evolution 67: 2838–2848. |
| haiku | Holman, L. & Kokko, H. 2013. The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 368: 20120053. |
| haiku | Kahn, A.T., Schwanz, L. & Kokko, H. 2013. Paternity protection can provide a kick-start for the evolution of male-only parental care. Evolution 67: 2207–2217. |
| haiku pdf | Kokko, H., Booksmythe, I. & Jennions, M.D. 2013. Causality and sex roles: prejudice against patterns? A reply to Ah-King. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 2–4. |
| haiku pdf | Kokko, H. & Mappes, J. 2013. Multiple mating by females is a natural outcome of a null model of mate encounters. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 146: 26–37. |
| Vahl, W., Boiteau, G., de Heij, M.E., MacKinley, P.D. & Kokko, H. 2013. Female fertilization: effects of sex-specific density and sex ratio determined experimentally for Colorado potato beetles and Drosophila fruit flies. PLoS one 8: e60381. | |
| haiku pdf | Kokko, H., Klug, H.M. & Jennions, M.D. 2012. Unifying cornerstones of sexual selection: operational sex ratio, Bateman gradient, and the scope for competitive investment. Ecology Letters 15: 1340-1351. |
| haiku pdf | Jennions, M.D., Kahn, A.T., Kelly, C.D. & Kokko, H. 2012. Meta-analysis and sexual selection: past studies and future possibilities. Evolutionary Ecology 26: 1119-1151. |
| haiku pdf | Jennions, M.D., Kokko, H. & Klug, H. 2012. The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25: 591-598. |
| haiku | McCartney, J., Kokko, H., Heller, K.-G. & Gwynne, D.T. 2012. The evolution of sex differences in mate searching when females benefit: new theory and a comparative test. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 279: 1225–1232. |
| Kokko, H. & Jennions, M.D. 2012. Sex differences in parental care. Pages 101-116 in: The Evolution of Parental Care (N. Royle, P.T. Smiseth and M. Kölliker, eds.) Oxford University press. | |
| haiku pdf | Lehtonen, J. & Kokko, H. 2012. Positive feedback and alternative stable states in inbreeding, cooperation, sex roles and other evolutionary processes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 367: 211-221. |
| haiku | Mokkonen, M., Kokko, H., Koskela, E., Lehtonen, J., Mappes, T., Martiskainen, H. & Mills, S.C. 2011. Negative frequency-dependent selection of sexually antagonistic alleles in Myodes glareolus. Science 334: 972-974. |
| haiku pdf | Meier, C.M., Starrfelt, J. & Kokko, H. 2011. Mate limitation causes sexes to coevolve towards more similar dispersal kernels. Oikos 120: 1459–1468. |
| haiku pdf | Rankin, D.J., Dieckmann, U. & Kokko, H. 2011. Sexual conflict and the tragedy of the commons. American Naturalist 177: 780-791. |
| Lehtonen, J. & Kokko, H. 2011. Two roads to two sexes: unifying gamete competition and gamete limitation in a single model of anisogamy evolution. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65: 445-459. | |
| haiku | Anthes, N., David, P., Auld, J.R., Hoffer, J.N.A., Jarne, P., Koene, J.M., Kokko, H., Lorenzi, M.C., Pelissié, B., Sprenger, D., Staikou, A. & Schärer, L. 2010. Bateman gradients in hermaphrodites: An extended approach to quantify sexual selection. American Naturalist 176: 249-263. |
| Jennions, M.D. & Kokko, H. 2010. Sexual selection. Pages 343-364 in: Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology (D.F. Westneat & C.W. Fox, eds.) Oxford University press. | |
| haiku | Booksmythe, I., Kokko, H. & Jennions, M.D. 2010. Sexual selection: the weevils of inbreeding. Current Biology 20: R672-R673. |
| Klug, H., Heuschele, J., Jennions, M.D. & Kokko, H. 2010a. The mismeasurement of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 447-462. | |
| Klug, H., Lindström, K. & Kokko, H. 2010b. Who to include in measures of sexual selection is no trivial matter. Ecology Letters 13: 1094-1102. | |
| Eliassen, S. & Kokko, H. 2008. Current analyses do not resolve whether extra-pair paternity is male or female driven. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62: 1795-1804. | |
| Jeschke, J.M. & Kokko, H. 2008. Mortality and other determinants of bird divorce rate. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63: 1-9. | |
| Kokko, H. & Jennions, M.D. 2008. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 919-948. | |
| Knopp, T., Heimovirta, M., Kokko, H. & Merilä, J. 2008. Do male moor frogs (Rana arvalis) lek with kin? Molecular Ecology 17: 2522-2530. | |
| Heubel, K., Lindström, K. & Kokko, H. 2008. Females increase reproductive effort when future access to males is uncertain. Biology Letters 4: 224-227. | |
| Kokko, H. & Jennions, M.D. 2008. Sexual conflict: Battle of the sexes reversed. Current Biology 18: R121-R123. | |
| haiku pdf | Kokko, H. & Wong, B.B.M. 2007. What determines sex roles in mate searching? Evolution 61: 1162-1175. |
| Rankin, D.J. & Kokko, H. 2007. Do males matter? The role of males in population dynamics. Oikos 116: 335-348. | |
| Kokko, H., Jennions, M.D. & Brooks, R. 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annual Reviews of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 37: 43-66. | |
| Kokko, H., Gunnarsson, T.G., Morrell, L.J. & Gill, J.A. 2006. Why do female migratory birds arrive later than males? Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 1293-1303. | |
| Pizzari, T. et al. (23 authors) 2006. Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312: 690 (Correspondence). | |
| Rankin, D.J. & Kokko, H. 2006. Sex, death and tragedy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 225-226. | |
| Stoehr, A. & Kokko, H. 2006. Sex differences in immunocompetence: what does life history theory predict? Behavioral Ecology 17: 751-756. | |
| Välimäki, P., Kaitala, A. & Kokko, H. 2006. Temporal patterns in reproduction may explain variation in mating frequencies in the green-veined white butterfly Pieris napi. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61: 99-107. | |
| Kokko, H. & Rankin, D.J. 2006. Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Philosophical Transacions of the Royal Society of London B 361: 319-334. | |
| Kokko, H. & Morrell, L.J. 2005. Mate guarding, male attractiveness and paternity under social monogamy. Behavioral Ecology 16: 724-731. | |
| Härdling, R., Kokko, H. & Elwood, R.W. 2004. Priority versus brute force: when should males begin guarding resources? American Naturalist 163: 240-252. | |
| Kokko, H. & Brooks, R. 2003. Sexy to die for? Sexual selection and the risk of extinction. Annales Zoologici Fennici 40: 207-219 (invited review). | |
| Kokko, H. & Jennions, M. 2003. It takes two to tango. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 103-104. | |
| Kokko, H., Ranta, E., Ruxton, G.D. & Lundberg, P. 2002. Sexually transmitted disease and the evolution of mating systems. Evolution 56: 1091-1100. | |
| Ruckstuhl, K.E. & Kokko, H. 2002. Modelling sexual segregation in ungulates: effects of group size, activity budgets and synchrony. Animal Behaviour 64: 909-914. | |
| Kokko, H., Mackenzie, A., Reynolds, J. D., Lindström, J. & Sutherland, W. J. 1999. Measures of inequality are not equal. American Naturalist 154: 358-382. | |
| Lindström, J. & Kokko, H. 1998. Sexual reproduction and population dynamics: the role of polygyny and demographic sex differences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265: 483-488. |